The 2010 Flash Crash

What happened on May 6, 2010, when US stock indices fell about 5% to 6% in minutes and rebounded almost as quickly: a large automated sell order in an already nervous market, how high-frequency traders passed contracts back and forth, why some stocks traded at a penny and others at $100,000, and the circuit breakers and trading bands that followed.

Lesson 10 of 14 · 6 min read · Advanced · Members · Last reviewed October 2026

The short version

On May 6, 2010, with markets already down over 4% on worries about Europe's debt crisis, the major US stock indices fell a further 5% to 6% within minutes, then rebounded almost as fast, closing down about 3%. A mutual fund company had started selling $4.1 billion of S&P 500 futures through an algorithm that targeted trading volume, without regard to price or time. As high-frequency traders passed contracts back and forth, volume rose, and the algorithm sold faster. Buyers vanished, a five-second pause in the futures market stopped the slide, but in individual stocks more than 20,000 trades went through at prices 60% or more away from where they'd been minutes earlier, some at a penny. Regulators added single-stock circuit breakers, then "limit up-limit down" price bands.

By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to

  • Describe how a large automated sell order and vanishing liquidity caused the flash crash
  • Explain why market and stop orders filled at extreme prices in individual stocks
  • Describe the circuit breakers and price bands adopted afterward, and what they mean for ordinary orders

Why this matters

On the afternoon of May 6, 2010, major US stock indices, already down over 4% for the day, suddenly fell a further 5% to 6% in a matter of minutes before rebounding almost as quickly. In those minutes, more than 20,000 trades in over 300 stocks and exchange-traded funds went through at prices 60% or more away from where they'd been just before, some at a penny a share and some at $100,000.1 The cause wasn't new information about companies or the economy but the way buy and sell orders met, or failed to meet. It's the clearest case of a market breaking down because of how trading works, and it's why US stock markets now have automatic price bands and pauses.

A nervous market

The day opened to unsettling news about Europe's debt crisis, and the cost of insuring against a Greek default rose. Around 1 p.m. the euro began falling sharply. By 2:30 p.m. the VIX volatility index was up 22.5% from its opening level, investors were buying Treasuries in a flight to quality, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down about 2.5%. Buy orders waiting in the S&P 500 futures market, the E-Mini, had fallen 55% from the morning, to about $2.65 billion.1

The sell order

At 2:32 p.m., a mutual fund company began selling 75,000 E-Mini contracts, worth about $4.1 billion, to hedge its stock holdings. It used an algorithm set to sell 9% of the previous minute's trading volume, without regard to price or time. The last time this trader had sold that many contracts, it took more than five hours. This time the algorithm finished in about 20 minutes.1

High-frequency traders bought much of the first wave, then began selling to cut their positions. Between 2:45:13 and 2:45:27 p.m., they traded over 27,000 contracts, about 49% of all volume, while adding only about 200 contracts to their net holdings: they were passing contracts back and forth. The rising volume made the algorithm sell faster, even though few new buyers had arrived. From 2:41 to 2:45:27 p.m., E-Mini prices fell more than 5%. By 2:45:28 p.m., buy orders in the E-Mini had shrunk to less than 1% of their level that morning.1

Worked example: a sell program that follows volume (hypothetical)
MinuteContracts traded in the marketAlgorithm sells next minute (9%)New buyers who actually want to hold
120,0001,8002,000
240,000, as traders pass contracts around3,6001,500
370,0006,3001,000

Volume rises because the same contracts change hands again and again, not because buyers are arriving. An algorithm that reads volume as a sign it's safe to sell faster speeds up exactly when real demand is shrinking, and the gap between selling and genuine buying has to be closed by falling prices.

At 2:45:28 p.m., the futures exchange's automatic safeguard paused E-Mini trading for five seconds. When trading resumed, prices stabilized and began to recover.1

The rest of this lesson is for members

Still to come in this lesson: Pennies and $100,000, What changed, the key takeaways, and 2 quiz questions with explanations.

Membership opens every lesson in the curriculum, the capstone projects, the interactive tools, and the members-only channels in the Hyperion Entities Discord. The first lesson of every module stays free.

Become a member Sign in

Go deeper

Notes and sources

  1. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010, report of the staffs to the Joint Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues (September 30, 2010). Checked 2026-10-17. Back to text
  2. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC Approves Proposals to Address Extraordinary Volatility in Individual Stocks and Broader Stock Market, press release 2012-107 (June 1, 2012). Checked 2026-10-17.
  3. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. CFTC Charges U.K. Resident and His Company with Price Manipulation and Spoofing, press release 7156-15 (April 21, 2015). Checked 2026-10-17.