Accounting Red Flags
A working checklist of the signs that a company's numbers deserve a closer look, where to find each one, and how to respond without jumping to conclusions.
The short version
A red flag is a reason to look closer. It isn't proof of anything. The most useful ones fall into four groups: numbers that disagree with each other, such as profit rising while cash falls; estimates that keep moving in the direction that helps profit; presentation choices, such as a widening gap between adjusted and reported earnings; and events around the people who prepare and check the accounts, such as a change of auditor or a restatement. One flag usually has an ordinary explanation. Several pointing the same way call for a wider margin of safety, a smaller position, or passing on the investment altogether.
By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to
- Recognize the main warning signs in the financial statements, the notes, and company filings
- Calculate the measures that reveal them from three years of figures
- Decide how to respond when warning signs appear together
Why this matters
Most companies report honestly, and most oddities in a set of accounts have dull explanations. But the cost of missing a real problem is high, and the signs are often visible in public documents before the news breaks. This lesson collects them in one place. Use it as a routine check on any company being researched, in the same spirit as Fact, Interpretation, and Confirmation Bias: the goal is to look for evidence against a company as carefully as evidence for it.
Group 1: numbers that disagree
The three financial statements describe the same business, so they should tell the same story.
- Profit rising while operating cash flow falls for more than a year or two.
- Receivables growing much faster than revenue. Days of receivables climbing year after year.
- Inventory growing much faster than sales. Days of inventory climbing, especially if margins are also slipping.
- Deferred revenue falling while revenue grows, at a company that's paid in advance.
- Capital spending rising faster than revenue while expenses fall as a share of revenue. That can mean ordinary costs are being recorded as assets.
- Margins far above every competitor's with no clear reason in the business.
- Large cash balances alongside heavy borrowing, or interest income that looks too small for the cash reported.
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 500 | 550 | 616 |
| Net income | 40 | 46 | 54 |
| Cash from operating activities | 44 | 32 | 16 |
| Operating cash flow ÷ net income | 1.10 | 0.70 | 0.30 |
| Accounts receivable | 55 | 78 | 111 |
| Days of receivables | 40 | 52 | 66 |
| Cost of goods sold | 300 | 330 | 370 |
| Inventory | 49 | 68 | 96 |
| Days of inventory | 60 | 75 | 95 |
| Allowance for unpaid receivables, as a share of receivables | 4% | 3% | 2% |
The income statement shows a company growing steadily: revenue up 23% in two years and profit up 35%. The rest tells a different story. Receivables and inventory have both roughly doubled. Cash from operations has fallen by almost two thirds. And while customers take longer to pay, the company is setting aside less for the ones who won't. If the allowance had stayed at 4%, it would be $4.4 million in year 3 instead of $2.2 million. No single line proves anything. Together they say the profit growth isn't showing up anywhere else.
Group 2: estimates that keep helping
Every estimate has a reasonable range. Watch the direction of travel.
- Allowances and reserves shrinking against the balances they cover.
- Useful lives extended, or residual values raised.
- A higher expected return or discount rate in the pension note than last year, or than similar companies use.
- A valuation allowance on deferred tax assets released in a year that needed the help.
- More costs treated as assets: software development, contract costs, or "other assets" growing faster than the business.
- Reserves released into profit. The SEC's chairman described companies building up reserves in good years to draw on in bad ones as stashing accruals in "cookie jars".1
A company that meets or narrowly beats expectations every quarter, with a helpful change of estimate each time, deserves more suspicion than one whose results bounce around. Real businesses are uneven.
The rest of this lesson is for members
Still to come in this lesson: Group 3: presentation, Group 4: the people and the process, How to respond, the key takeaways, and 2 quiz questions with explanations.
Membership opens every lesson in the curriculum, the capstone projects, the interactive tools, and the members-only channels in the Hyperion Entities Discord. The first lesson of every module stays free.
Go deeper
- Famous Accounting Frauds and What They TeachFinancial Statement Analysis in Depth (depth track)
- SEC Filings: 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-KPart 4: Research and Valuation
- Margin of Safety and Valuation RangesPart 4: Research and Valuation
- Position SizingPart 5: Building a Portfolio
Notes and sources
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The "Numbers Game": remarks by Chairman Arthur Levitt, NYU Center for Law and Business (September 28, 1998). Checked 2026-10-11. Back to text
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99: Materiality (August 12, 1999). Checked 2026-10-11.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy. Investor Bulletin: How to Read an 8-K. Checked 2026-10-11.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy. Investor Bulletin: How to Read a 10-K. Checked 2026-10-11.